More Browsers Leads to More Buyers

 As we have all adjusted to this most unusual year, several trends have begun to appear.  First of all, people have more time to search on the internet for just about everything.  I've read that they don't buy clothing, but they do seem to want to buy real estate.  And that isn't limited just to residential property for themselves.  We are seeing more hits to our website, more web leads, and more inquiries from outside sites like LoopNet.

That's good news for sellers.  With so many people looking, there will turn out to be more sales.  In fact, one of the ways that we can tell how motivated they are to buy is that they may put in several requests in a row on different types of property, not just on different listings of the same type.  That suggests investment buyers are seriously searching.  With the stock market so volatile, and interest rates so low, that isn't surprising.  

Connecticut is perfectly situated for those kinds of buyers.  Actually, they come from other states as well as our own.  They are looking for places that should do well in any future phases of this pandemics, or other such events.  We are finally getting good press for the way our State behaves, and it's reflected in our area's appeal to out-of-state real estate buyers.  In addition, our positioning for warehouse and distribution is well known, particularly now that Amazon has gotten so big here.

Remember that there are fewer than four months left of this calendar year, and that it's never too early to start a transaction that needs to close before December 31st for tax reasons.  Whether you are a buyer or a seller, it's best to hustle now, and enjoy the fruits of your labor in appreciating property, now or in the future. 

Residential Homes Statistics 2020 (Through 2nd Quarter)



From the New Haven Register By Dan Haar : Connecticut’s lost decade — and how to avoid a repeat

By Dan Haar, New Haven Register, click to read online

 

 

 

Think back to the first week of 2010.

 

The reigning champion UConn women’s basketball team was steaming toward five more rings in the next seven years. A former Stamford mayor who lost the Democratic primary for governor four years earlier was about to win the seat and hold it for most of the decade.

 

Obamacare was adopted but not yet in place. The Sandy Hook tragedy was three years away. And the Great Recession had hammered Connecticut along with the rest of the nation.

 

As the decade opened, Wall Street had started back upward but Main Street still reeled at rock bottom, facing a tough slog. Exactly ten years later, the nation has recovered heartily and then some, under two presidents.

 

Connecticut? A lost decade by just about every economic measure.

 

A lost decade — and worst of all, we’re not in the clear yet. One more decade like the one that just ended and we are basically western New York, a place with some great assets that’s on the way to someplace else, looking to recapture its old glory.

 

The hopeful news is, we can still avoid another 10-year meltdown. We need some demographic breaks, a solid dose of attitude changes and an embrace of the elusive political middle.

 

Let’s look at the numbers first.

 

A lost chunk of the state

 

Connecticut’s jobs count, the most important measure of how we’re doing, grew by 4 percent in the decade, a total of 66,000 positions if we count annual averages including preliminary 2019 totals through November. By contrast, Massachusetts and the United States both added 15 percent.

 

Those are just numbers. Consider what it really means. If Connecticut had gained jobs at the same rate as the nation, we would have added another 179,000 — enough to support as many households as there are in New Haven, Hartford, Fairfield and Greenwich combined.

 

 

It’s as if we lopped off a hefty chunk of the state, heavily populated by young college graduates. And the housing market reflects that haircut.

 

When the decade started, a single-family house at the median among all sales — where half sold for more and half less — stood at $242,000, in shooting range of the Massachusetts median of $285,000, according to The Warren Group, which tracks house sales. As of 2019, Connecticut was up just 8 percent to $261,000.

 

In Massachusetts, that median house in 2019 fetched an even $400,000 — a 40 percent jump. And although there are no official figures for national median prices, one fastidious website calculates the U.S. gain at 44 percent for the decade.

 

 

What does that mean for the typical Connecticut homeowner? If you owned a house that was worth $350,000 in Connecticut a decade ago, you missed out on $112,000 of price gains that people in Massachusetts and most other states realized in just those ten years. Some parts of Connecticut, notably Fairfield County, fared even worse.

 

Shrinking in an expansion

 

If you’re counting income, we’re still the richest state in average income per person and we’re in the top ten in how much typical families earn. But we’re slipping there, too. That’s harder to measure because the reported numbers bounce around due to small Census sample sizes.

 

We do know this: The biggest picture of all — the total value of goods and services produced — shows Connecticut’s lost decade at its starkest. The total product for Connecticut actually shrank by 0.5 percent, adjusted for inflation, when we compare the average for all of 2009 with the average for the 12 months ending last June, the latest data we hav

 

That’s a shrinking economy after the U.S. recession ended, friends. One slice that meant thousands of livelihoods — the manufacturing of non-durable goods such as food, pharmaceuticals and household items — slipped by almost half, to $6.9 billion a year. The much larger, higher paying finance and insurance sector cratered by 23 percent.

 

Massachusetts, ignited by the allure of Boston and explosive gains in bio-sciences, shot ahead by 20 percent overall even as we shrank. And the nation as a whole, which grew slower than Connecticut from 2005 to the end of 2009, expanded by 19 percent in the decade that just ended.

 

What Connecticut doesn’t have is an unemployment problem, as we track the nation in jobless rates. That’s partly because we don’t have vast tracts of poverty, another strength of Connecticut. And it’s partly that many people just leave if they’re out of work or under-employed. The Census numbers show an average of 24,000 people a year moving to other states over the last five years, making Connecticut the 4th worst in the continental United States, ahead of only Illinois, New York and New Jersey.

 

 

 

 

I’ve studied Connecticut prosperity full-time for four months shy of 25 years as an economics reporter, columnist and business editor. I knew these numbers intellectually. Seeing them all together, calculating them as a decade in the mirror, I feel a punch in the gut, a wistful tear for lost opportunity as a transplanted Connecticut homeowner by choice, an employee in a struggling industry and the father of a newly minted teacher in Boston who’s not coming back.

 

What happened?

 

We’ve argued the causes of Connecticut’s relentless recession from the very start. Tax increases, driven by decades-old debts and obligations, piled up even as former Gov. Dannel P. Malloy cut the size of government by eliminating more than 5,000 state jobs.

 

We’re in the hole by as much as $100 billion including pensions and future health care for public employees, despite restructuring the debts and benefits multiple times. The problem isn’t today’s benefits, though they’re too high for older state employees. It’s that for decades, Democrats and Republicans alike failed to set aside money.

 

Costs for utilities, education, entertainment and health care have climbed as they have in the rest of coastal America. But the perceived value of living in Connecticut didn’t keep pace in large part because we lacked, and still lack, a true magnet city with enough critical mass to attract millennial college graduates.

 

Leafy suburbs unconnected to major cities fell out of favor and the center-cities Connecticut does have are not able to compete with second-tier metros such as Minneapolis, Dallas and Pittsburgh, let alone the giants.

 

 

Manufacturers slowly moved operations to cheaper places. Corporate headquarters, facing profit pressures, retrenched. A few big events bled thousands of jobs, chiefly rising competition for the native American casinos and consolidation in financial services — especially the breakup of General Electric’s GE Capital. That breakup cost 2,700 lucrative jobs, nine times more than the more widely cited but less important exit of GE’s headquarters from Fairfield to Boston in 2016.

 

The Trump-led tax reform of late 2017 didn’t help. Although high-income earners have seen a nice break, the new limit of $10,000 on federal income tax deductions for state and local taxes hurts the entire Northeast, costing Connecticut residents an estimated $2 billion a year.

 

What we have, in short, is a vicious cycle in which people leave or stay away because costs are high in comparison to perceived value, or they leave or stay away because we don’t have any large cities in Connecticut. And that of course drives up costs further because it lowers the tax base. Warren Buffett, the multi-billionaire corporate investor, didn’t help matters by warning people to avoid states with high unfunded liabilities.

 

Rena Carreiro was among those who felt herself moving sideways during the decade. She had worked as an office manager for a manufacturer since 1993. Over the last ten years the business retrenched in Connecticut, moving work elsewhere.

 

Carreiro performed finance, human resources, production control and inventory tasks, taking on more work as people left. “It was wonderful to learn all those new things,” the Waterbury resident said.

 

But there were few opportunities for career advancement. The company — which Carreiro didn’t want to name — closed her plant at the end of 2019. She landed a job at Parker Medical in Bridgewater, a growing company where she has high hopes and new optimism.

 

Solutions

 

Like Rena Carreiro, we as a state can take measures to avoid another lost economic decade. Here’s a 6-point plan:

 

  TAKE A MIDDLE PATH ON POLICY— Democrats and Republicans need to meet in the middle. That means Republicans need to tone down the two-note chorus about taxes and state employee benefits, and help govern like they did briefly in 2017, when the Senate was split 18-18. And it means Democrats must pull back on the throttle for great programs we can’t afford. It’s no coincidence that Massachusetts does well with Republican governors and Democratic legislatures, and the nation does well under centrist presidents such as Bill Clinton. The middle path means Republicans need to stop trashing the unions and Democrats need to stop protecting every iota of their benefits. Modest givebacks on retiree health co-payments and cost-of-living adjustments won’t kill anyone and will help the state. And the middle path means pushing hard for efficiency gains in government at the state and especially in cities and towns, where property taxes are way too high.

 

  SHOW SOME CONNECTICUT PRIDE — Yeah, that was the name of a basketball team but it’s hard to find a place that trashes itself as much as we do in this state. Knock it off. You know who you are. Connecticut has great education, access to mountains, oceans and countryside and a lot of smart and innovative people. We have good cities, not great ones, with truly notable food and music, and access — there’s that word again — to two of the greatest cities in the world. Lack of growth has left us more open space and less sprawl. Enjoy it. Get psyched. Work hard, play hard and stop feeding the collective depression. It’s a small state, go make something happen.

 

  EMBRACE RISK — What do finance, insurance and defense manufacturing have in common? They’re all built around controlling risk. That’s what we do and it shows in the personality of the state. When it comes to business, we need the culture of put-it-out-there enterprise that seems to make no sense, like Amazon, Facebook, Tesla and Microsoft at their founding. We had it in the 19th and early 20th centuries and lost it.

 

  MARKET TO IMMIGRANTS AND YOUNG PARENTS - That’s our sweet spot because it’s more about education and family than urban lifestyle. Connecticut does welcome immigrants in contrast to Trump’s America and that can help us. We do have a good record of attracting people in their 30s. We need to reach those groups more actively with targeted campaigns.

 

  KEEP WORKING ON CITIES AND TRANSPORTATION - Connecticut will never compete on price with North Dakota and Mississippi, nor should we try. Building the place up matters even though it costs money. It’s working in Stamford.

 

  LET EQUILIBRIUM HAPPEN -- State Sen. Matt Lesser, D-Middletown, thinks it’s fine that houses are not overvalued. More opportunity for buyers, he says. It’s a matter of balance and equilibrium. At some point, millennial professionals might figure out that living in a great house in Milford or New Haven’s East Rock neighborhood, with a 15-minute commute, beats five to an apartment in Brooklyn and two hours a day on the subway. That may mean house prices have to fall even further, which sucks for us homeowners. But it’s a path that will work. Embracing equilibrium means understanding that bike lanes in and out of cities, and saving historic landmarks such as the Sanborn Library in Bridgeport, which was tragically demolished in August, will add up.

 

The cul-de-sac

 

Following a balanced path leaves plenty of room for debate over whether we more urgently need to cut taxes — the Republican solution — or, as Democrats insist, increase value by adding amenities to make the state more hospitable.

 

The same argument unfolds issue by issue: paid family and medical leave, a $15 minimum wage, housing subsidies for the poor, housing subsidies for the rich (yeah, apartments in Hartford at a cost of tens of millions for state taxpayers), corporate handouts, expanded Medicaid and on and on. In each one, there is a middle path of compromise that get too little attention. Paid family and medical leave, for example, is too rich a program, too soon, although it’s worthy.

 

All the while, we lost a decade.

 

Twenty-one years ago, a regional economic report warned that Connecticut was in danger of becoming a “cul-de-sac,” an economic dead-end, in part because it lacked “dynamism” in the coming century of urbanization and globalization. Hmmm.

 

“Right now investment is bypassing the state and we have become in many respects that cul-de-sac,” said Donald Klepper-Smith, a longtime economist who has, as of 2020, entered semi-retirement and moved to Massachusetts and South Carolina.

 

Klepper-Smith’s view: We need leadership and strategy to achieve fiscal discipline. “I don’t think it gets fixed in my lifetime because I don’t think we have the political will to fix it,” he said.

 

I’m more optimistic but only slightly. But there are many fronts in this war. Clearly, after the lost decade Connecticut just endured, there is no more wiggle room.

 

Rich Dupont, a manufacturing consultant, is helping the community college system, especially at Housatonic in Bridgeport, train machinists for the thousands of open jobs in advanced manufacturing that will disappear if qualified people don’t materialize. What he says about that battle also applies to the entire state economy.

 

“We are teetering on the edge.”

 

Dear Santa--A Realtor's List

Dear Santa,

We know that the following list is not the kind that you can just deliver to us.  We're hoping, however, that some of the magic of Christmas will make our wishes come true!  Here's what we'd like:

1. Please help our clients understand that required paperwork is not mandated by us, and that we are the ones who get in trouble if it isn't signed in a timely way;
2.  Please remind our clients that only get paid when a transaction occurs, so that they should realize how important it is for us to be compensated fairly when that happens;
3.  We wish that everyone knew what things are within our job description--and there are a lot of them--and what is not, so that people would be reasonable about what they are asking us to do;
4.  Please don't shoot the messenger--we only tell clients what the market is doing, not what we think it should be, and higher prices help us also;
5.  We would love to be treated like the professionals most of us are, and in the same category as lawyers, bankers, and accountants;
6.  Understand that we get into trouble mostly when we try to do something that isn't within our field, so remember that we are the agents, not the principals;
7.  Help us meet all of the deadlines, and keep the communication lines open;
8.  Please respect our time, especially since we are providing it regardless of whether we are compensated later for it;
9.  Especially at this time of year, remind everyone that we have families and obligations also; and
10. Please, Santa, make 2020 a wonderful year for Connecticut real estate!

We wish Happy Holidays to all of our clients and friends, and best wishes for a wonderful New Year, and thank them for all of their business.  And Santa, thanks for reading our list!

From all of the Realtors at Pearce Real Estate